Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ch. Khalid Zia Kahloon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 17:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ch. Khalid Zia Kahloon

Uncertain notability. No references supplied. None of the companies this person has been involved with has (so far) apparently deserved their own WP article (except for the Pakistan Peoples Party), none of the other members of the 'Narowal District Association' elected seem to have a WP entry. Whilst no doubt prominent on a local level, I'm not sure anything immediately indicates justification for an article (hence why I've dropped it here) CultureDrone (talk) 10:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and - based on the authors name, a possible COI CultureDrone (talk) 10:11, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - vanity article with no source for notability.--Boffob (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep If the Kahloon Group is notable, he is as its chairman and a poliitcal figure. I think the significance is more than local. The argument that none of the others have an entry is circular--if we remove each article as written on that basis, none will ever have an entry. One of them at least seems to be a member of the parliament, if I get the abbreviations right, & therefore notable,Riffat Javed Kahlon. someone who knows how to work with material from this area needs to work on referencing this. DGG (talk) 22:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Khalid Zia Kahloon" gets no news archive hits, unreferenced and likely to remain so a BLP nightmare. RMHED (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete no documented notability per google. Manitobamountie (talk) 23:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.