Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centro Warwick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:36, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Centro Warwick

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage of this shopping centre is trivial and routine, such as attempted burglaries and abductions. The topic therefore fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG, and as such we should not have an article on it. Till 11:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:28, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete agree with nom. Fails WP:GNG. coverage is limited to trivial incidents and nothing in depth about the centre. LibStar (talk) 12:34, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 02:42, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.