Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CenterWatch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy as per request. Bluerasberry, feel free to ping me for a U1 deletion if the requested sources to not show up in due time. kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CenterWatch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ken Getz at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Getz is the founder of this organization. Neither he nor this organization seem to meet notability criteria with identified sources. I talked with him and he told me he would provide sources but has not followed through. Could I have this userfied to user:bluerasberry/CenterWatch until the article has better backing? Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication of notability. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:25, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy as suggested. Currently does not qualify for an article, but maybe Bluerasberry can improve it and bring it back. --MelanieN (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 02:47, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jim Carter (from public cyber) 07:02, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.