Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cattle Call (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 05:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cattle Call (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable topic; fails WP:GNG. No "significant coverage" from Google, just unreliable sources. TBr and ley 23:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 08:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 08:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 08:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk). — Frankie (talk) 08:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A search in both English and Japanese fails to find enough reliable or non-independent sources. Creating a notable game is not an indication of notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. None of the sources constitutes more than passing mentions of the company, so there is insufficient third-party coverage to justify a self-standing article like this. --DAJF (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.