Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle of Dragon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Castle of Dragon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had nothing meaningful besides [1] in a video game reliable sources custom Google search and no reviews listed at our major repository for old reviews, MobyGames. A redirect to Athena (company) could suffice. czar 03:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 03:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches noticeably found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 04:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do whatever you want. This nomination was opened because of my disagreement to this article being deleted. Now, although I've just found a small review (half a page) in Nintendo Power Issue 012 (page 77), I must admit that, while I still feel that, somehow, the subject is sufficiently notable, this title has lacked enough coverage to advocate that it deserves an article. Sorry for the inconvenience. Canyq (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of notable sources. ZettaComposer (talk) 13:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.