Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casio PB-1000

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Casio PB-1000

Casio PB-1000 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources or indication of notability, just a list of specifications. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I strongly disagree with deletion. The article text describes it as a notable early portable computer through e.g. its use of an LCD screen. Articles on specific early computers are valuable and this one has useful information and citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.54.68.187 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:05, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, although the article for sure needs improvement and references. This computer was quite the thing back in the day (e.g. it was one of the first widely available computer with touchscreen functionality), the problem here is mainly that this is a topic from the 80ies, so references online likely are sparse. The article could use the attention of an expert to be improved. I doubt deletion is the best way to go here. --Reinoutr (talk) 14:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.