Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cashkaro.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cashkaro.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional. Nothing significant but another startup company. Getting funded from A, funded from B, and list goes on where notable media covered merely as press release. For being in Wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a Startup directory. 1000s of startups happens every day and many get funded as well. Just another one. Notability required repeated significant coverage by media as well as significance in itself. building Wikiepdia page for their publicity, releasing articles on major media as paid. Covered once in a while. or covered mostly by Startup blogs not the notable media. startup does not mean they are Encyclopedia notable. seems like the article is written by close associate or company itself. Light2021 (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 16:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 16:00, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - the sources are unconvincing to me either, even the nominal RSes appear to be writeups of promotional push, or just funding rounds - David Gerard (talk) 17:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I've been watching this one for some time, it's all PR from the information and sources, which go to company specifics such as their funding, financing, business plans, interviewed information and other PR; this is the same with the article which entirely is formatted like a PR business listing, it's not surprising this has not changed in the nearly 1 year of existence, and chances are, like all of them, the company or its affiliates started this, and have not changed it in the thoughts of it actually being acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 17:54, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a company prospectus for potential investors in the form of a Wikipedia article, which WP is WP:NOT. No indications of notability or significance either. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:00, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.