Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Wars (app)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:11, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Wars (app)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, can't find any significant third-party sources indicating notability. Contested prod with reasons of unlikely notability as well Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 21:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as the prodder. Unlikely to meet the GNG. --Izno (talk) 04:52, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Coverage in Softonic, Mac Observer, Slide to Play (which looks reliable enough after looking at their editorial staff/review policy here), and G4 seem to indicate that this passes for notability. --MuZemike 01:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 04:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

keep the Mac Observer review looks great. The others, less so. Assuming those are all RSes (and they look it) this is above the bar though. Hobit (talk) 14:09, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.