Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carole Gill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carole Gill

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Source links don't work. Delete. Tal Brenev (talk) 23:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neither the article nor my searches have provided any evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:55, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Shows up in blogs, but there does not seem to be any coverage in reliable sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As far as I can see this fails WP:GNG .LM2000 (talk) 03:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.