Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Fatima

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:15, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Camp Fatima

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable summer camp site. Page has not been sourced since its creation in 2015, and there is nothing to indicate why this camp is notable. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge to Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester. No evidence of notability to justify standalone article. Alex Shih ^Talk 12:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be opposed to a merger to the Roman Catholic Diocese of Manchester article either. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge from history if anyone thinks there is something worth merging. I'm not a huge fan of merging minor things such as this into articles on dioceses, but I also won't put up a fight about it. I just think that we should actually have someone who wants to merge content and knows where it should go rather than merging because it is possible. A redirect allows a merge if needed while helping the reader out. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it just isn't notable enough even for a redirect, despite the connection with the church. Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- might redirect or merge to diocese, as one of its programs, but probably better not, treating it as the NN thing it is. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:47, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete. Normally, I'd say WP:ATD argues for the redirect suggested above, but there's also another camp by the same name in NJ, so redirecting to the New Hampshire diocese would be misleading. Maybe a WP:DAB page for the two of them? -- RoySmith (talk) 04:37, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.