Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cacani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:20, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cacani

Cacani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company / product development from university that was tagged for notability since 2014, then attempted PROD and it was canceled with the reason that it has an updated software version. It appeared in the local Singapore anime festival called Anime Festival Asia. It is mentioned in passing in some news articles. [1] [2]. No article in JA WIkipedia. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:35, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- promo article for an unremarkable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. What I could find are company profiles, promotional sites, and the like. I did find one source specifically about them: an interview with the program's creators, but the site appears to be published on Wordpress and thus isn't reliable. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Not Delete -- This is a new animation software that is being actively developed, with active users as we build up the community. We have an active Facebook page ^[1]. Why is being listed in Japan Wikipedia important, when this is a software from Singapore? Full Disclosure: I'm part of the development team on CACANi. We're new to wiki pages editing, apologies for not doing something according to wiki standards, but we try to be neutral as possible in our posts editing, as neutral as what we can see from similar software from our industry, like ^[2] and ^[3]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cacaniwiki (talk • contribs) 02:04, 30 January 2017 (UTC) — Cacaniwiki (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Delete Its hard argue that this isn't a promotional article. Plus admitted COI going on now too over recent edits and I can't see how deprodding an article and then admitting to being a developer can be considered neutral. We are not a marketing provider.SephyTheThird (talk) 16:30, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to SephyTheThird: please consider that we did not have a clue what deprodding means (until it's pointed out to us). There's a world of protocols in wiki editing that we're only getting to know. We thought we were supposed to remove the section to indicate that the article has been updated with more information. And yes, we'll rather freely admit to being the developer rather than hide behind some random username. As for the marketing component, no, we agree Wikipedia is not a marketing provider. But as been said, we are still understanding what constitute 'marketing' and what is 'information' in the eyes of the wiki admins and gatekeepers. The current content is there mainly in reply to edits that seems to refer to us as vaporware. We have no issue keeping in line with the requirements to maintain the integrity of the site, as long as we figure out what that is. Cacaniwiki (talk) 22:57, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.