Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittany Ashworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. no sources = no article and there is consensus that ENT is not met Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brittany Ashworth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ENT and WP:BIO. I can't find any evidence of significant coverage or a significant acting career. [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:17, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going argue for a keep. Appears to be notable as she has "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Gosox5555 (talk) 02:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

which roles have been significant? LibStar (talk) 02:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I'm sorry, Gosox, I don't see it. She has exactly six credits on IMDB, the most recent over two years ago. Two are for single eps of two separate TV series. One is a very minor role in a TV movie. The next TV movie she appeared in she was 55th in credits order. She's had, to date, one decent role in a wide release, but a single significant role isn't enough to pass the criterion. Ravenswing 09:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The fact that this article was created by a user called "Showbizinfo" who has only edited pages to discuss Brittany Ashworth, and that Showbizinfo knows Brittany's school grades, tells me that . . . . Well, never mind. Ravenswing is right about the evaluation of her place in showbiz. These just don't seem to be "significant roles in multiple notable" productions. --Glenfarclas (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Does not matter one whit that she has paused her career to concentrate on school (bless her). That she has significant roles in two notable films meets WP:ENT. The improvement of the article calls for normal editing, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per User:Ravenswing, all but one role is extremely minor, and thus doesn't quite meet WP:ENT (which requires multiple significant roles, not multiple roles in significant films). Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.