Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandun DeShay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandun DeShay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural AFD. I've just declined a speedy on this as I think he just scrapes through A7, but I'm not convinced this actually is worth keeping. Procedural nom so I abstain. – iridescent 19:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. As far as I can tell, only one of the cited refs provides the kind of coverage that contributes to notability, the urb.com cite. Some of the others verify a producer credit on a work, but only as a passing mention, and others only verify the existence of the work without verifying that DeShay had anything to do with it. Would need at least one more notability-contributing cite (per WP:GNG, significant independent secondary coverage in a reliable source) to establish notability. —chaos5023 (talk) 03:11, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. More citations have been added since the AfD was created, and between the lot I think it's clear that the subject is at least marginally notable. —chaos5023 (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly feel this is a classic case of Ephemera. Glorified artist with references mainly from blogs. No true notability. However my delete nomination is to abstain. – Osatmusic (talk) 03:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Brandun DeShay[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2010 (UTC)Brandun DeShay[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 15:16, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.