Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braintonik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Braintonik

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company and Google News provided a minor news article here and press releases here, here and here and a reprint of a press release here. I found a review for one of their games, Strimko, here. A different search provided this which wouldn't be much help. SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not passing WP:GNG -- no independent, reliable in-depth coverage on the subject. As usual, lots of directory entries. The French news article doesn't appear to be centered on the company. The press releases are primary. Of course, WP:NOTINHERITED from games. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 00:35, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't find much out there that could possibly establish notability beyond merely existing. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.