Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bodgeshwar temple, Mapusa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" !voters do not provide enough rationale/sources to keep this article. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:36, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bodgeshwar temple, Mapusa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious notability. Zzarch (talk) 08:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I've cleaned it up and provided citations and a map link. It is certainly notable both locally and as a tourist attraction. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:53, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Week keep The little content is somewhat promotional in tone, weak on real content. Sourcing is very weak with respect to wp:notability. But ability to meet wp:notability looks likely. North8000 (talk) 21:36, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete — All sites are promotional sites, not reliable. The site is unlikely to meet the notability criteria. X.One ^SOS 12:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of RS to establish notability and per WP:NOTGUIDE Pol430 talk to me 15:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.