Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Crow Media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Crow Media

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May fail WP:NORG despite innumerable references in notable sources mentioning maps and guides that this company has published. However, no references are provided that cover the organisation in any depth. But the page does effectively advertise their range of products. A Google search revealed the company's founder was nominated in 2016 in the Edward Stanford Travel Writing Awards but the company itself was not. (He did not win). So it seems worth testing the concensus of the community, as it fails WP:CORPDEPTH, but does it meet WP:AUD with significant enough coverage to remain in mainspace? Nick Moyes (talk) 21:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 22:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep substantial coverage in reliable ondependent sources of their publications and founder. Notable publisher of maps and guides. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Very substantial coverage, internationally no less, given to this company and its operations.--Oakshade (talk) 03:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep substantial international coverage. independent publisher of note.--Fyodormd (talk) 11:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The references are enough to show meeting WP:GNG. It is sometimes very difficult to separate company and their product in terms of media coverage because anyone must be reported or discussed in relation to the other, although few exceptions may exist. –Ammarpad (talk) 01:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.