Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Clover

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Weekly Shōnen Jump#Features. ceradon (talk • edits) 02:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Black Clover

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no significant coverage by reliable third-party sources that attempt to establish the notability of this recently published manga series, hence seems to fail WP:GNG and more specifically, WP:BK. KirtZJ (talk) 14:08, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 14:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Weekly Shōnen Jump#Features, although this has been published in English reviews are spotty. I have no objection to taking this out of being a redirect if/when more sources come forward. Given that two editors have been blocked regarding this article recently it is something that needs to be watched. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:56, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Only coverage so far is by primary sources (Shonen Jump in US) and its shadowed ANN announcements. Has not appeared in Media Arts DB. Has it charted on Oricon? Needs the slew of anime and manga reviews from Fandom post, Publishers Weekly, Kirkus, ANN itself. 'AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.