Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bishwashuk Sevasram Sangha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:33, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bishwashuk Sevasram Sangha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to establish notability. Unreferenced since created in 2011. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, JSTOR, EBSCO, InfoTRAC, and ProQuest returned nothing but wikimirrors. Searches for ashrams near either of the two locations mentioned returned nothing that matched. Without significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources, does not meet WP:ORG. Worldbruce (talk) 07:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 07:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 07:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 07:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 00:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 05:37, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete likely as that's all enough to suggest a non-notable and unimprovable article. Notifying past taggers Bgwhite and LeoFrank in case they have comments. SwisterTwister talk 07:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:21, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hopefully this can be relisted for a third time to allow better insight. As drastic measures, I'm notifying Indian users Dharmadhyaksha,{U|AKS.9955}}, Sitush and Human3015. SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - here because of SwisterTwister's ping but I've done my own checks. As others have said, there does not appear to be suitable coverage in sources. I wonder if this creation was made more in the spirit of advertising than Wikipedia. - Sitush (talk) 14:50, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.