Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BJYM Karnataka

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith. Missvain (talk) 17:54, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BJYM Karnataka

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources are routine coverages. It fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A wing of a political party that fails WP:NORG due to lack of significant independent coverage in reliable media. This subset of a political party is not independently notable and lacks non promo content to expand. Article had been created with the sole purpose to WP:Promote its office bearers. During an election the party and its wings may get minor passing mentions as WP:NOTNEWS type coverage but those don't help with the notability. --DBigXrayᗙ 12:13, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted an edit of yours at the article, an edit that deleted coverage by the Indian Express, one of the more established, and presumably reliable, Indian news sources. You might legitimately complain that this subject lacks notability but please don't remove such indications of notability at the same time, unless you give a more complete explanation for that removal. Dhtwiki (talk) 02:02, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The "Annexation of Hyderabad" is notable and the topic of that coverage, the proposed memorial was never built. Removed per WP:CRYSTAL.--DBigXrayᗙ 09:09, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DBigXray: you remved the content again. I have reinstated it. It is not at all what WP:CRYSTAL is about. —usernamekiran (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:26, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and possibly Merge with BJP. Passing mention in sources, and usually in something done by BJP workers so fails WP:GNG. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Should just be merged with Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha, wings of political wings of political parties are not notable. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 16:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tayi Arajakate, Thanks for the review and the comment. Just wanted to note that I had already explored the possibility of a merge but the content is WP:NOTNEWS and unfit for any merge with BJP, IMHO. The BJYM is also a non notable run of the WP:MILL wing. DBigXrayᗙ 16:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources cited don't add up to notability. Seems like political promotion more than anything else. Glendoremus (talk) 03:41, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.