Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BBA Standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 01:20, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BBA Standings

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable list of non-notable people — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject does not meet general notability guidelines. Peacock (talk) 19:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just a list of names with no context to explain what it even is. Probably a candidate for speedy per A7. No assertion that any of these people are notable. DarkAudit (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.