Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asexual Awareness Week

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Asexuality#Community. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asexual Awareness Week

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotable observance - üser:Altenmann >t 06:11, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep challenging this partly on principle: a two-word nom as "nonnotable" is crummy. The article has five sources used as references, plus two additional citations given in the EL section. They should be addressed in detail. - Brianhe (talk) 10:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sources do not satisfy wikipedia standards of being significant reliable independent coverage, in short, "nonnotable". In wikipedia, the onus of proving notability is on you, not on me, regardless how "crummy" my objection is. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Yes, this article needs work, but this seems like a notable topic. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "seems" is the key word. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:44, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Asexuality#Community. Doesn't merit its own article but should be mentioned in the main article on the topic. Harry ^{Let us have speaks} 09:59, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Asexuality#Community. As it was mentioned, it's notable, but I don't think it worth an independent article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.