Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ascender arborists

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Flowerparty^☀ 00:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ascender arborists

Ascender arborists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Declined speedy, but still dubious notability SpinningSpark 16:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - even if true (and how many exactly is "one of the few" anyway ?) this fact does not make the company sufficiently notable. Passportguy (talk) 16:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable, no sources. Fails WP:CORP. Johnuniq (talk) 04:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete under corp tag Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.