Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asa Akira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:33, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asa Akira

No evidence of notability per WP:PORNBIO. Tabercil (talk) 14:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 14:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Suitable for a comprehensive adult database, but not notable enough for Wikipedia. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 14:47, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence of passing WP:PORNBIO or WP:N. Tatarian (talk) 15:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She's a regular on Bubba the Love Sponge's show; wouldn't that make her notable?SPNic (talk) 15:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation – I hadn't read the pornographic actor criteria, but have now. I agree: (a) no major awards won or nominated for, (b) hasn't made a ground breaking contribution, and (c) hasn't featured much in mainstream media. When I added the profile, I thought that inclusion in the adult film databases and IMDB was enough, however according the these criteria it isn't. P3L3 (talk) 15:25, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Three WP:PORNBIO nominations in a row? remember WP:NOTCENSORED--Ipatrol (talk) 15:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ahem... take a look at the list of active participants in Wikipedia:WikiProject Pornography. I think you'll find my name there. :) Tabercil (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:PORNBIO. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:44, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent reliable sources = not notable. Descíclope (talk) 23:56, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Her coverage here is probably enough to satisfy WP:N, and her Bubba the Love Sponge appearances may be enough to satisfy WP:PORNBIO criteria 3. Epbr123 (talk) 17:15, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Relisted on account of Epbr123's new source. Sandstein 17:49, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the source raised by Epbr123, she now satisfies PORNBIO, amongst other things. coccyx bloccyx_(toccyx) 20:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Fg2 (talk) 01:40, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.