Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annavarapu Ramaswamy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Annavarapu Ramaswamy

Annavarapu Ramaswamy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are two problems with this article, tone and notability. First, it consists almost entirely of peacock language written to praise its subject rather than describe him neutrally. Second, there isn't a lot of independent in-depth coverage of the subject, although there is plenty of primary or vanity coverage. The first problem can be solved by stripping out most of the article, which would not leave much, and not enough to sustain musical notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:50, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Keep but copyedit to remove peacock language. Add references to solid sourcces.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails notability in music or NMUSIC.Platogrew (talk) 16:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— Platogrew (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. 15:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- an entirely promotional article on an subject of questionable notability (if any). WP:TNT / WP:PROMO delete; no value to the project. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete promotional article and the subject is a violinist over 90 years in age and was performing actively a few decades ago.Clearly lack indepth references about the subject .Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:MUSICBIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.