Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André Migner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

André Migner

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NBIO, as tagged since August 2008. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:44, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SOLDIER, WP:GNG, and WP:SIGCOV.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 17:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Wikipedia is not a genealogy web site. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:41, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. I'd be very surprised if this wasn't written by a descendant; not WP:NOTABLE in any way. Boleyn (talk) 08:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- A NN settler in Quebec, of no interest except to family historians. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No seeing any evidence of notability. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability shown besides the purely genealogical claims, and no strong reliable sourcing besides his descendants' self-published family trees. Bearcat (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Gaarmyvet --Guy Macon (talk) 00:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.