Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/André Kërr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

André Kërr

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

No notability, no good source, propaganda JoaquimCebuano (talk) 01:40, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 November 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:57, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. One passing mention. Rest seem self-promotional at best. Appears to have been created (along with the related Academia Brasileira de Astrologia Védica) by the subject. —

Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 14:12, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Doesn't meet WP:GNG. ProofRobust 18:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Astrology, Hinduism, and Brazil. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:52, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Deletion based on argumentum ad ignorantum, if you don't understand the topic you can't just delete the full article, there is several pages of jyotisha authors that has the same level of references and you can find here on Wikipedia, you have the biggest institution in the country referencing the author as notable, maybe you can edit in the article what you think is propaganda, but the whole page is not propaganda itself. --ThelemaSanskrit93 (talk) 19:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC) (blocked sockmaster)[reply]
Keep - Meet WP:GNG. Good source in a big portal [1] that agree with his notability and ABAV, the biggest institution of Vedic Astrology in Brazil, has an article about him.--ClaraCastilho79 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC) (blocked sock of ThelemaSanskrit93)[reply]
Keep - The author is a best-seller in Vedic Astrology and there is great websites of Brazil specialized in the theme that agrees with his notability, like ABAV. User that is requesting deletion doesn't have any interest in the topic and there is no knowlege about it. If someone thinks that the page is not neutral, because there is only good things about the author, you should erase this part of the text, but there is no need to delete the whole page. MaryaReginaBR (talk) 21:06, 25 November 2022 (UTC) (blocked sock of ThelemaSanskrit93)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:N and any other notability criteria. The article doesn't have even a single reliable source, all the keep votes are likely from paid editors (most likely socks) and two of the accounts (ClaraCastilho79 and MaryaReginaBR) were created solely to vote in this AfD and in another one (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academia Brasileira de Astrologia Védica) related to this same person. Obvious case of WP:SOAPBOX. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 22:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Accounts ClaraCastilho79 and MaryaReginaBR are proven socks of ThelemaSanskrit93. Kacamata! ^Dimmi!!! 15:04, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as classic vanispamcruftisement. XOR'easter (talk) 22:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.