Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anantbodh Chaitanya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anantbodh Chaitanya

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Anantbodh Chaitanya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG. Has passing mentions and two short interviews [1][2] about a cultural promotion in Lithuania he was associated with. No sources indicating that he's a notable spiritual teacher or author. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: fails WP:NARTIST as well as WP:BIO. Lacks significant coverage in reliable media. Walrus Ji (talk) 19:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Please don’t delete his Wikipedia page, I learned lots of him through this page. Sat — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8004:2781:32E5:892C:3224:34ED:A8B6 (talk) 08:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• This page is quite informative I have been following him since a long time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:3A80:96F:FA2F:A89A:3B6A:E7F0:2979 (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can continue reading about him from his website. Not everyone can have an article on Wikipedia. See the criteria for having a wikipedia article on WP:BIO Walrus Ji (talk) 10:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Only passing mentions in some independent media. No wide coverage found.--Redtigerxyz ^Talk 10:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly keep this article on Wikipedia. Anantbodh Chaitanya is a notable person. He is a Prominent disciple of Acharya Mahamandaleshwar of Mahanirvani Akhara Swami Vishwadevanand Puri. He belongs to an Authauntic Monk Tradition of India. He is a founder trustee of Drishti Foundation affiliated with United Nations. In Malta he spoke on Frux channel on Mudras you can see here interview.^[1]. In Lithuania also some news article mention about him and his works. ^[2]. You already mentioned few articles where he promoting Vedic culture. You can see his published paper also on the internet about Ancient Hindu Based Education System.<ref>https://www.academia.edu/6775974/Ancient_Hindu_Based_Education_System<ref>. There are a lot of articles what mentions about him on the internet. Thanks. Deimantas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deimantas007 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Deimantas007, the issue here is that this person has not done anything remarkable to have an article. You can read the criteria here on the link WP:BIO. Please read my above comment. Walrus Ji (talk) 18:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I don't think there is significant coverage on this person. Although it's well written you should consider moving it to a draft and improving on sources etc UpcomingPurse^TalkToMe 17:38, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.