Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anantanand Rambachan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn; meets WP:NAUTHOR. Clearly I need to focus more on my WP:BEFORE. Thanks once again to David Eppstein. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 18:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure) AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 18:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anantanand Rambachan

Anantanand Rambachan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NPROF and WP:NAUTHOR. The citation counts on Scholar might be enough for WP:NPROF#C1, but I'm skeptical. For those keeping track: yes, I am nominating lots of articles on scholars of Hinduism and related topics. For the backstory, see Talk:Hinduphobia in academia. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - notable author on Advaita Vedanta and Advaita Vedanta; The Limits of Scripture is an excellent book on Vivekananda's influence on Hindu modernism. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:25, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

? Do you mean Keep? Xxanthippe (talk) 03:59, 9 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

• Joshua Jonathan, Care to provide some links to reviews for the book? I just found doi:10.7825/2164-6279.1116, but without more that's not a WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NPROF pass. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Passes WP:Prof#C1 noting that the important cites are to single-author publications. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

• Keep. I just added 10 reviews of 6 books to the article. I think it's enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.