Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amra Kojon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amra Kojon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability. Expected to be non-controversial, but PROD nominated in 2006. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 06:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no indication why this gathering of 100 people (yes that few) is at all notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING. A hundred people attending isn't notable, and the only links happen to be official promotional sites for the event. How convenient. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; nothing to add to what has already been said. --HyperGaruda (talk) 07:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.