Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpsten family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alpsten family

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created by an WP:SPA solely dedicated to creating articles on this family, which seems to have no WP:RS coverage. Even the basic claim that they originate from Småland doesn't seem to be covered anywhere. The only member of the family who is potentially notable is Ellen Alpsten. Wikipedia is not a web host for vanity projects like this so the article should be deleted. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree entirely with Spiderone's assessment of this article and those associated with it. Even the one on Ellen Alpsten is largely promotional of her novels. Ingratis (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTGENEALOGY. Geschichte (talk) 09:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Geschichte. Vanity page for vanity articles which are soon to also be deleted at AFD. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 11:30, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Geschichte. Fails GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not meet notability standards due to a lack of sigcov. Appears also to be a WP:CONFLICT. Wikipedia is not a genealogy. Family histories should be presented only where appropriate to support the reader's understanding of a notable topic and this article is not aiding this purpose. Such-change47 (talk) 02:45, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.