Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alina Padikkal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh666 06:59, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alina Padikkal

Alina Padikkal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Non of the articles listed as reference or in google search go even an inch towards notability  — comment added by Force Radical (talk • contribs) 10:13, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to note that the "sources" given by Arsh 18 consists mainly of trivial interveiw with the subject in question. Also the mention at Bharya (TV series) is unsourced .Most of the coverage the actress has received seems to be from fan mags and a few interviews from newspapers — comment added by Force Radical 🎆talk 🎄 contribs🎆 09:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Finding her funny bone on tv, Anchor-actor Alina Padikkal on her journey & Romance is not my cup of tea, I love action more: Alina Padikkil ; these articles from the most valued and taken news websites has proven that the actress is more notable to be encyclopedic. --Arsh 18 (talk) 12:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any idea about Indian TV, but Bharya (TV series) suggests she is notable. She seems to be similarly notable as Ronson Vincent. Xx236 (talk) 13:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:17, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 14:21, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Article got independent coverage. @Arsh 18 add few more news sources, can keep as per WP:BIO.Genome$100 (talk) 13:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete--Typical trivial promo-covg/interview.Encyclopedic notability ain't so cheap.Winged Blades^Godric 15:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- does not meet WP:NACTOR just yet. WP:TOOSOON per review of available sources. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Interviews are primary sources and therefore not counting towards notability. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.