Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Zetton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 06:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Zetton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This character does not establish notability independent of Ultraman through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lots of fan trivia but no sources and no indication of sufficient notability to justify a self-standing article. Incidentally, it would probably have been easier if all of the similar Ultraman monster articles were listed for deletion at the same time. --DAJF (talk) 06:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lacking citations to assert notability. TTN (talk) 10:46, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete part of a whole slew of non-notable characters that we don't need articles on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.