Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alien Guts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ultra Monsters. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Guts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As with most 'monster of the week' non-recurring villains, there is insufficient coverage in reliable third party sources to meet the requirements for an article. See also WP:NOTPLOT. While normally I would suggest a merge into either a characters list or an episodes list, neither appear to exist in a form that would make merging a suitable option, with the closest approximation to a characters list being Ultra Monsters, which is not a prose list, or possibly List of Ultraman monsters, which seems limited in scope. Sven Manguard Wha? 19:57, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this from the anime and manga deletion sorting page, since I don't think it is related to anime/manga. Calathan (talk) 21:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Wrong one. Will fix. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (or possibly Redirect to Ultra Monsters). This seems well suited to Wikia, but it's clearly not notable enough for Wikipedia. A redirect won't hurt anything, but it seems a bit pointless. It's like making a redirect to Scooby Doo for some bad guy that they unmasked in 1969. Do people actually search for this stuff? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:14, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it fails to assert notability. TTN (talk) 20:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable character.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
merge or redirect It is not significant enough for a separate article, but it should certainly not be deleted. Asking for deletion is saying that we should not even have a cross-reference, that someone who comes here and looks for it will find nothing. Has the nom any reason to say that such is appropriate? If there's no reason against redirection, we shouldn't be asking for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.