Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Darabi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Darabi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The person in question does not meet the criteria of recognition and customized and received money Persia ☘ 07:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ☢️ Radioactive 🎃 (talk) 08:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet WP:BASIC, People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:15, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I agree with Whiteguru, a google search for this person did not reveal any significant coverage meeting Wikipedia standards. As this person is based in Iran, someone from that country should conduct the search, perhaps there are sources we are not finding or are in a different language. If this is the case, I would consider revising the vote. CosmicNotes (talk) 09:17, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BASIC no significant coverage. Zackdasnicker (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.