Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alena Raeva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 02:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alena Raeva

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMODEL, article in ru-wiki was deleted. Gruznov (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete failed to satisfy WP:GNG---Richie Campbell (talk) 03:48, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the winner of one of Miss International franchise beauty contests (therefore meets notability criteria) who has significant coverage in Russian media (see REN and Pyatnitsa on YouTube Russian channels); almost all sources (except one or two) are the secondary ones. Mark Ekimov (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that Russian media is generally considered to be of questionable quality, relisting for further discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — J947 ^{(user | cont | ess)}, at 22:05, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, winning a beauty competition does not mean automatic notability. Dan arndt (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. "Face of Beauty" is not so big as to rate automatic notability. Bearian (talk) 01:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.