Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian Ambassador to the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 17:06, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian Ambassador to the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

23 "Albanian Ambassador to..." articles were recently nominated and removed after unanimous "delete all" on the 9th:

"fails WP:ORG. this is part of a sprawling series of "Albanian Ambassador" articles that simply confirm an embassy exists, it's also not named like "Embassy of" as in standard. Lastly there is no bilateral article to redirect to. also nominating for same reasons:" - LibStar (talk)

Here's another couple dozen:

These were culled from Category:Lists of ambassadors of Albania. A further 50 subcategories dare the intrepid at Category:Ambassadors of Albania. Pax 08:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Country deletion sorting
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply] Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:05, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete all purely directory listings and merely confirm existence but not notability. LibStar (talk) 05:10, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, per LibStar. 23 editor (talk) 06:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all, no basis for standalone notability. Why not make it a list, though? GregorB (talk) 11:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - diplomati-spam insanity. St★lwart¹¹¹ 23:29, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to support notability. Kosovo looks like the only one with some potential, but article us undeveloped and inadequately referenced. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 02:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.