Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akshardham (New Jersey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 21:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Akshardham (New Jersey)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally tagged for speedy G7 (author request), but there are two non-negligible contributions from IPs, which we can't verify that they were used by the author. Planned Hindu temple, slated to be quite large, but it appears that the project has been abandoned. Neutral. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:25, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems like this place does not exist as this point and is not overly notable even if completed. either way (talk) 03:30, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only references found are facebook, the one small paper listed and an enews that is just a copy of this article. We are not a crystal ball. If the temple is actually built than maybe there will be enough reliable sources that cover it. Until then there is no notability being proven. As an addition such phrases like "This will be a honor for USA to have such a megnificent Mandir(temple) build on American land." are completely un encyclopedic. tyvm Pudge MclameO (talk) 03:56, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The monument has not received approval by the government of the state of New Jersey to be built. I created this article anticipating construction would start earlier and a greater number of media sources would be released. However, with a lack of references and with no indication whether or not the monument will actually be built, the article should be deleted. It can be recreated later if construction begins and a greater number of sources are available ^The Wo rld 16:30, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.