Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air China Flight 403

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:48, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Air China Flight 403

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet the event criteria. All coverage is from the day of the event. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and China. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Singapore. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of lasting effects whilst also failing the event criteria and WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. Plenty of sources, subject compliant with other policies. --cyclopia ^speak! 14:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a textbook example of a lack of continued coverage. It is, however, terrifying that such a well-sourced article could be deleted based on that. The rules say delete but I can't bring myself to !vote for it. Closer may interpret this how they wish :) Toadspike (talk) 09:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I could not find anything written after the day of the event. I added more citations to improve it. Procidic (talk) 15:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A classic example of WP:NOTNEWS (policy on What Wikipedia is not). The article provides the answer that there is no lasting effects in the "Aftermath" section "...the accident is still under investigation". There is no indepth coverage beyond the relatively short news cycle. There were 37 million aircraft movements in 2023 with 30 incidents involving turboprops and jet aircraft. Article is just not notable event. -- Otr500 (talk) 10:32, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, minor incident that fails WP:EVENTCRIT and WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE per previous responses. As with similar minor incidents, it can be adequately summarized in the article about where the airport where it took place. Carguychris (talk) 22:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:CASESTUDY and WP:EVENTCRITERIA FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:34, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:CASESTUDY and WP:EVENTCRITERIA IDKUggaBanga (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.