Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventist Singles Yearbook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD A7, no indication of significance. Tim Song (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adventist Singles Yearbook

Adventist Singles Yearbook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

IP continually removes CSD tags, not notable website for single members of a religious sect. Talk page stated they "will be using the site to deploy and administer various tests and resources to our target audience." Wikipedia is not a website host. GregJackP (talk) 01:36, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• It IS notable because it is part of the Religious sect and is led by its leaders! We will not use wikipedia to deploy anything, but to share our research and document it to the public in a collaborative manner (together with the public). Can you please stop deleting this page!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlibazisi (talk • contribs) 01:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Please review what Wikipedia is not. (GregJackP (talk) 01:46, 9 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete, non-notable website. I can't find any significant information about it whatsoever.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 02:16, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - FYI, the creator of the article just tagged my user page for CSD-A7 (website). Not very christian. (GregJackP (talk) 02:21, 9 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.