Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Harrington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:55, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Harrington

Article does not assert notability using reliable, third-party sources. VG ☎ 08:34, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:19, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not pass WP:PROF. Appears to be a recent PhD (the article does not give a date but since his undergrad degree is 2001, the PhD could not be earlier than 2004). GoogleScholar[1] gives citation hits of 22, 10, 4, with h-index of 3. Similar results in WebOfScience. No significant academic awards or honors listed. Created by User:Aeh345, so a possible WP:AUTO/WP:COI case. Nsk92 (talk) 12:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of meeting notability requirements. Nuttah (talk) 20:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:PROF, per Nsk92. Pete.Hurd (talk) 21:18, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly fails WP:PROF as shown by Nsk92. --Crusio (talk) 09:11, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Recent phd, one significant paper, and,from the article, now working for a PR consultant firm!. DGG (talk) 03:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. NO claim of notability. Bongomatic (talk) 05:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.