Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Eesa Niamatullah (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:20, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Abu Eesa Niamatullah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not meet the notability guidelines for BLPs (basic criteria) and is relatively unknown. Also, the page contains contentious material which is poorly sourced. References used for this page are trivial coverage by secondary sources.

This person fails to meet the additional criteria for notability as well. The person has not received a well-known and significant award or honor, and has not been nominated for such an award several times. The person has not made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field. The person does not have an entry in the Dictionary of National Biography or similar publication. Mujaddouda (talk) 20:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:19, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to say Delete. There are some claims to notability here (e.g. being interviewed at Davos, being nominated for a notable award), and there is some coverage from independent sources, but most of it doesn't focus on him or distinguish him from other Muslim religious leaders. On balance, I don't think it adds up to enough to pass WP:BIO. Robofish (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I say Delete as well. Simply put he is not notable and none of the references provided suggest he is.--الدبوني (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:05, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per previous discussion on the talk page; when there are no sources to improve an article, the subject can't be notable enough to include.--عبد المؤمن (talk) 23:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.