Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abtin Abassi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 07:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abtin Abassi

Abtin Abassi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG. Macbeejack 07:18, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination
GoggleGoose (talk) 12:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Maker here. Meets GNG because article in The Telegraph / British GQ / Vice / more I will keep finding. I will try to add more Deondernemers (talk) 02:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Article by GQ here is a paid piece, the second source by The Telegraph is self-published here. I doubt the Genuity of the other sources as well. Jamiebuba (talk) 10:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: This Forbes citation is unreliable an written by a contributor. According to @Jamiebuba, the British GQ article is also a paid one. Promotional theme failing business related guideline. No GNG. All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 14:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abtin_Abassi&oldid=1215970792"