Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhoynagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Consensus cannot be determined after two relists. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 23:44, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abhoynagar

Abhoynagar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure whether it is a city, town, village or some other geographical region. Couldn't find anything substantial other than postal zip code. May fail at WP:NGEO. Hitro talk 20:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per these sources. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - peripheral Google references do not suffice to show notability. WP is not intended to just list random name references.--Rpclod (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• These are non-peripheral reliable sources that show that this topic passes WP:GEOLAND, nothing like "random name references". 86.17.222.157 (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, meets WP:GEOLAND as a "Populated, legally recognized place", it is Ward No. 7 of Agartala, a quick gsearch shows that it contains the Regional Institute of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology (could have its own wikiarticle?), Hindi Higher Secondary School, TRIPURA FOREST DEVELOPMENT & PLANTATION CORPORATION LIMITED - www.tripurainfo.com/Login/UpLoad/1548.pdf, btw here is a map showing it. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It exists and per WP:GEOLAND, it's notable. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing about the article indicates what it is or why it is notable, much less that it is either populated or a legally recognized place.--Rpclod (talk) 12:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.