Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abctales

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 10:57, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abctales

Abctales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'd love to include this. On the evidence, I do not se how we can do so. DGG ( talk ) 05:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There seem to be a number of secondary references for this web site:

1. news article from The Argus
2. news article from Spiegel online (German)
3. paragraph at booktrade.info
4. short article at The Telegraph (UK)
5. para graph in the book Book Lovers: The Good Web Guide
6. short paragraph in The Writer's Digest Guide To Query Letters
7. mention in Lonely Planet Guide to Travel Writing

Given all the reliable secondary sources, with entries 1, 2, and possibly 4 qualifying for indepth, I would say they this web site is already notable. Mark viking (talk) 05:47, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've added some of those references to the article. Enough coverage in reliable sources to be notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 08:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 08:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 08:28, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.