Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aapno Gramin Rajasthan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 08:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aapno Gramin Rajasthan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A newspaper in India with a circulation of 5,000 across seven states is little more than a vanity publication at present. I've raised the issue at WT:INB in case non-English sources might improve the thing but it seems to fail WP:NORG. Sitush (talk) 10:20, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:15, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. There's no significant independent coverage. It appears to be a vanity page by a conflict-of-interest editor. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 14:56, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.