Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/92 Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

92 Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, so far as I can tell. James^x12345 16:52, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator Thanks for the work you guys have put in - I couldn't find anything when I looked, but was clearly looking in the wrong places. James^x12345 08:37, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Along with other organisations associated with the Conservative Party such as the Cornerstone Group and the No Turning Back group, it was a notable and influential Conservative faction. The article is referenced and has an entry in a political encyclopaedia which I have used.--Britannicus (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A faction which according to sources had membership of around 15% of UK Parliament MPs in the mid 1990s and was influential in the internal convulsions of the governing party. AllyD (talk) 06:03, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As the nomination was withdrawn the nominator User:Jamesx12345 or an Admin can close this as Speedy Keep.--Jersey92 (talk) 23:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.