Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 American Samoa Republican presidential caucuses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to 2024 American Samoa presidential caucuses#Republican caucuses. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:43, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 American Samoa Republican presidential caucuses

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite sources existing, there is no reason for this article to exist separate from 2024 American Samoa presidential caucuses#Republican caucuses. There it can be sufficiently covered in one sentence. Esolo5002 (talk) 00:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge In uncontested race, results are easily and best covered in main article. Reywas92^Talk 03:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with 2024 American Samoa presidential caucuses#Republican caucuses: Subject doesn't contain the necessary WP:SIGCOV for a standalone article. Merge as a WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 00:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge There's very little information other than the election results and the majority of sources have nothing to do with this specific race. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Should understand that even if there are territories that do not participate in the 2024 US presidential election race, but for this article, there are full secondary sources, redirecting will not make it better, so if this Republican caucus would be deleted, the article about the Democratic caucus should have been deleted as well.

Memevietnam98 (talk) 11:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article for the Dem caucus is more notable than this one. An incumbent President lost the race from someone within his party. And that one has more coverage than this one. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 11:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.