Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 SGP3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 20:10, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2023 SGP3

2023 SGP3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page, along with 2022 SGP3, is just a list full of redlinks with no sources establishing notability. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 16:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 16:36, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Unlike 2022, this one has at least some minor coverage in refs like this. I am not impressed and leaning weak delete for now. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This is a new competition in the Speedway world and it is extremely likely that the riders listed in this event will go on to become World or European champions in the future. Therefore the article page will become increasingly relevant over the coming years and references will increase significantly as the riders move up to the U19 and U21 age groups. Pyeongchang (talk) 14:37, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Potential of notability in the future is not a good enough reason to establish notability now. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 12:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Lack of SIGCOV in sources, which even then are limited to highly specialist publications dedicated to motorcycle racing. The link provided by Piotrus is a WP:PRIMARY reference, coming from the Fédération Internationale de Motocyclisme itself. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  06:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  While some references are specialist publications dedicated to motorcycle racing, they certainly aren't ALL like that. WP.pl (sportowe fakty) is one of the largest news agencies in Poland, akin to BBC.co.uk in the UK. Johnny2hats2 (talk) 22:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Those links are only to a general result page and are not articles demonstrating the notability of the race. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 21:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Apologies, Sportowe Fakty must have switched the meeting reports to different URLs since the article was created. I have now added the relevant meeting reports to references section, which should help establish notability of the races. Johnny2hats2 (talk) 14:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:34, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I'm confused as to why Wikipedia would not want an article on a sporting event that is covered live on TV in multiple countries throughout the world via Eurosport and Discovery+. It's a feeder competition for SGP and SGP2, in a similar vein as MotoGP3 and MotoGP2 is to MotoGP. It's an annual event for which there is already a main hub page. Johnny2hats2 (talk) 22:16, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Same issues as discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2022_SGP3. The sources mentioned here being from a significant source only are race results and not articles dedicated to the race. Minimal coverage not demonstrating significance. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 21:30, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  The news articles from Sportowe Fakty have now been added to the references section. Johnny2hats2 (talk) 14:18, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both. Fails GNG, sources in article and BEFORE showed routine brief news and database style pages, nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV, addressing the subject directly and indepth Above provides no sources but a primary to evaluate.  // Timothy :: talk  19:38, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.