Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13th Child

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

13th Child

The result was Procedural Keep. Articles have been nominated individually as no real connection between them exists. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 05:45, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

13th Child (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

And also:

This is a group AFD for several prod contested horror movies. The origional tagged tagged all these articles for notability issues, but the prods were subsequently contested by a third user. In order to form consensus, and prevent a whole lot of AFD's, i grouped these articles (Which are quite the same) to form one big AFD. Note that i have little opinion on this matter, just following procedure. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 18:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Delete I admit i did not check each and every movie included, but after checking two or three in detail it seems that they fail WP:MOVIE and WP:RS. While searching reliable sources the websites found are most times stores that sell the movies. The few reviews i actually found were based on blogs/personal websites thus failing WP:MOVIE. Also, specifically examining A Secret Handshake, none of the people involved in the movie seem to have their own wikipedia page. At the same time a budget of just a hunderthousand dollars seems to indicate that these are the kind of movies that don't go far in the mainline. (But then again, that was not true for The Blair Witch Project) Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 21:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural Keep - There's no underlying connection between any of these articles other than the fact that they were all PRODed at the same time. The notability issues are different for each and they should each be considered separately. -Chunky Rice (talk) 22:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy procedural keep. Unrelated motion picture articles must not be nominated at the same time, otherwise it creates one hell of a mess. No prejudice against renominating separately. 23skidoo (talk) 02:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural Keep as per Chunky Rice, 23skidoo. Edward321 (talk) 04:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/13th_Child&oldid=1068817091"