Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/宗 also known as .

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

宗 also known as .

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, AFAICT. Searching the nom de plume proves difficult, since the character and '.' occur frequently in unrelated articles. No real name given. The article's tone is promotional, but not "unambiguous advertising" and a somewhat credible claim of relevance is made. Hence AfD. Kleuske (talk) 22:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Couldn't find anything on google other than the artist's facebook and twitter page. Fails GNG. Bennv3771 (talk) 23:15, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced BLP. Cabayi (talk) 07:47, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The author is a newcomer - I have added a welcome and ProdwarningBLP to their talk page - will see if they can add any references that infer notability. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:TNT, also known as enough said. Bearian (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all of the above reasons! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly not something which should be included. MartinJones (talk) 06:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agree with nominator. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.